Vessel
Aortic Dissection
search
Aortic Dissection
, Dissecting Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic Aortic Dissection, Thoracic Dissection
Epidemiology
Gender: Most common in males by factor of 2-3 to 1
Age: 40-80 years old
Incidence
: 6000-10,000 per year in US
Rare: Accounts for 0.09% of
Chest Pain
presentations in U.S.
Pathophysiology
Aortic wall is composed of three layers: Intima (inner), media and adventitia (outer)
Aortic Dissection has a very different mechanism than
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
AAA is caused by atherosclerosis and involves all three layers of aorta wall
Aortic Dissection is caused by
Hypertension
and involves only the innermost layer (intima)
Intimal tear precedes dissection
Precautions
Keep Aortic Dissection in the
Chest Pain
differential diagnosis
Aortic Dissection may present in similar fashion to
Acute Coronary Syndrome
,
Pulmonary Embolism
,
Pericarditis
However, empiric antiplatelets and
Anticoagulant
s can result in worse outcomes for dissection
Atypical presentations are very common with a wide variety of findings that mimic other conditions (Malperfusion Syndromes)
Transient Global Amnesia
or
Altered Mental Status
Cerebrovascular Accident
(
Carotid Artery
malperfusion)
Painless lower extremity weakness or
Paraplegia
(e.g. spinal artery malperfusion)
Cold painful leg (iliac artery malperfusion)
Abdominal Pain
or
Mesenteric Ischemia
(superior
Mesenteric Artery
malperfusion)
New onset CHF or
ST Elevation MI
(
Coronary Artery
malperfusion)
Acute Kidney Injury
or
Renal Infarction
(renal artery malperfusion)
Older adults have less typical presentations
See
Chest Pain in Older Adults
Insidious onset of
Chest Pain
is more common in older adults than the sudden
Chest Pain
in younger adults
Tearing, ripping or sharp
Chest Pain
is often absent in older adults
Hypotension
is a more common presentation in older adults
Risk Factors
Male gender (>2:1 ratio)
Pregnancy
Incidence
increases during pregnancy and peaks in third trimester and
Postpartum Period
Still rare in pregnancy without other predisposing factors (e.g.
Collagen
vascular disease,
Hypertension
)
Stanford Type A Dissection is more common type
Cocaine Abuse
or other
Sympathomimetic
s
Chronic
Hypertension
(present in 70-90% of cases, esp uncontolled)
Giant Cell Arteritis
Family History
of aortic disease
Pre-existing aorta structural abnormalities
Bicuspid aortic valve
Aortic Coarctation
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Prior Aortic Dissection history
Cardiovascular procedures (especially recent)
Cardiac or aorta surgery
Cardiac catheterization
Connective Tissue Disease
(presentation at younger ages, <40 years old)
Marfan's Syndrome
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
Other risk factors
Hyperlipidemia
Tobacco Abuse
Weight Lifting
Pheochromocytoma
Polycystic renal disease
Chronic
Corticosteroid
use
Chronic
Immunosuppressant
use
Aortic wall infections
Types
Standford Classification
Type A (60-65%, Debakey Type I and II)
Ascending Aorta and/or aortic arch (dissection may extend intracardiac)
In a Debakey Type II, the Aortic Dissection is limited to the aortic arch
Type B (30-35%, Debakey Type III)
Descending Aorta (after origin of subclavian artery)
Symptoms
Chest Pain
(94% of patients)
Severe, sudden tearing
Sensation
in the chest, back or
Abdomen
(may radiate into legs)
Aortic Dissection pain radiates to back or
Abdomen
Myocardial Infarction
rarely radiates like this
Aortic Dissection pain is most severe at onset
Myocardial Infarction
pain is typically crescendo in nature
Neurovascular symptoms
Cerebrovascular Accident
Visual deficit
Hemiparesis
Bilateral paresis
Syncope
Extremity
Paresthesia
s
Symptoms
Test Sensitivity
at presentation with Aortic Dissection (based on IRAD Data)
Classic Triad (100%
Test Specificity
if present, but most cases are atypical and do not have all 3 findings)
Severe abrupt onset, ripping or tearing
Chest Pain
that radiates to back AND
Pulse
deficit or difference in upper extremity
Blood Pressure
>20 mmHg AND
Mediastinal Widening
or aortic knob widening on
Chest XRay
Timing
Sudden onset: 85%
Severity
Severe pain: 90%
Characteristics
Pain: 95%
Type A: 94%
Type B: 98%
Sharp pain: 64%
Tearing/ripping: 50%
Type A: 49%
Type B: 52%
Distribution: Typically involves both above and below the diaphragm
Anterior
Chest Pain
: 61%
Type A: 71%
Type B: 44%
Back pain: 53%
Type A: 46%
Type B: 64%
Abdominal Pain
: 35%
Type A: 22%
Type B: 42%
Migrating pain: 17%
Type A: 15%
Type B: 19%
Associated Findings
Syncope
: 9%
Type A: 13%
Type B: 4%
Signs
Blood Pressure
at presentation (based on IRADS results)
Hypertensive SBP>150: 49%
Type A: 36%
Type B: 70%
Normotensive SBP 100-150: 35%
Hypotensive or shock SBP: 16%
Type A: 25%
Type B: 4%
Blood Pressure
differential between sides
Poor sensitivity and
Specificity
for Aortic Dissection
Up to 20% of normal patients have a
Blood Pressure
differential of at least 20 mmHg
Pulse
on presentation
Pulse
deficit: 15-30%
Type A Dissection: Two thirds of those with pulse deficit
Type B Dissection: One third of those with pulse deficit
Positive Likelihood Ratio
when associated with acute
Chest Pain
or back pain: 5.3 to 5.7
Von Kodolitsch (2000) Arch Intern Med 160(19): 2977-82 [PubMed]
Palpable pulse differential
Less prominent pulse (e.g. radial pulse) on one side compared with the other
Aortic Murmur: 30%
Aortic Regurgitation
murmur suggests a Type A dissection with intracardiac involvement
Overall, new murmurs are found in 50% of Aortic Dissection patients
Cardiac Tamponade
(5% of Type A Dissections)
Findings associated with dissection of
Hematoma
Altered Mental Status
(12% of Type A Dissections)
Cerebrovascular Accident
(8% of Type A Dissections)
Focal neurologic deficit (e.g.
Hemiplegia
)
Pulse
deficits
Aortic Insufficiency
Mesenteric Ischemia
Acute Kidney Injury
Paraplegia
(spinal artery
Occlusion
)
Labs
Basic metabolic panel
Acute Renal Failure
may occur depending on level of dissection
D-Dimer
Consider when evaluating differential diagnosis
Normal
D-Dimer
(up to 10%
False Negative Rate
) does not exclude Thoracic Dissection
Serum
Troponin
Elevated in
Acute Coronary Syndrome
,
Aortic Regurgitation
Diagnostics
Electrocardiogram
Test Sensitivity
: 69%
Test Specificity
: Low (non-diagnostic)
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Myocardial Ischemia
Myocardial Infarction
Emergency Echocardiography
(bedside)
Evaluate for
Pericardial Effusion
Acute Aortic Dissection Score (ADD-RS)
https://www.mdcalc.com/aortic-dissection-detection-risk-score-add-rs
ADD-RS score criteria (1 point for each of the following present)
Any high risk condition (e.g.
Marfan Syndrome
, known aortic valve disease)
Any high risk pain feature (abrupt, severe, tearing
Chest Pain
,
Abdominal Pain
, back pain)
Any high risk exam feature (e.g. pulse or
Blood Pressure
differences, focal neurologic deficits)
ADD-RS score >1 or
D-Dimer
positive is an indication for CT Angiogram
References
Nazerian (2018) Circulation 137(3):250-8 +PMID:29030346 [PubMed]
Imaging
Aortic Angiography
(gold standard)
Test Sensitivity
: 90-98%
Test Specificity
: 95-98%
CT Angiography
Chest
(
Chest
CTA) - preferred first line study
Similar efficacy to
Transesophageal Echocardiogram
(TEE) or MRA
Test Sensitivity
: 100% with new generation CT (older studies quoted 94%)
Test Specificity
: 98% with new generation CT (older studies quoted 90%)
Risk of cardiac motion artifacts near the aortic root
EKG Gating can reduce this artifact
Transesophageal Echocardiogram
Limited availability at non-tertiary hospitals
Test Sensitivity
: 97%
Test Specificity
: 75-90%
Transthoracic Echocardiogram
Test Sensitivity
: 77-80%
Test Specificity
: 74-96%
Not recommended to rule-out Aortic Dissection (low
Test Sensitivity
)
Does identify Aortic Dissection complications (
Cardiac Tamponade
)
Bedside Ultrasound
evaluation on
Parasternal Long-Axis Echocardiogram View
(
PLAX View
)
Aorta Diameter Measurement on PLAX View
(for Aortic Dissection)
Measure the maximal distance between anterior and posterior walls of aorta
Probe should be perpendicular to the two aorta walls
Distance >4 cm is concerning for Aortic Dissection
Other suggestive findings:
Pericardial Effusion
, flap within the aorta
MRA
Chest
Not recommended as an emergency evaluation (may be indicated in some stable patients)
May be considered when iodinated contrast or CTA is contraindicated
Test Sensitivity
: 98%
Test Specificity
: 98%
Chest XRay
Test Sensitivity
: 64-71% (up to 90% for a completely otherwise normal
Chest XRay
)
Test Specificity
: Low (non-diagnostic)
Unlikely to demonstrate anything more than intrathoracic catastrophe
Mediastinal Widening
(progressive), aortic knob widening
Double density aorta (lines define margins of true and false lumens)
Tracheal,
Bronchi
al or esophageal deviation to the right
Pleural Effusion
Complications
Neurologic deficits
Cerebrovascular Accident
Unequal perfusion
Unequal pulses
Unequal extremity
Blood Pressure
s
Myocardial Ischemia
or
Myocardial Infarction
Proximal Aortic Dissection involves the coronary arteries in 3% of cases
Right
Coronary Artery
is most often involved (inferior
ST Elevation
)
Aortic Regurgitation
(with
Cardiogenic Shock
)
Aortic valve rupture
Cardiac Tamponade
Management
Acute Management
Consult Vascular Surgeon early on suspicion of Aortic Dissection
See Surgical Management as below
Lower
Blood Pressure
(in addition to
Heart Rate
lowering)
Goals to reduce risk of further dissection (confirm goal levels with accepting vascular surgeon)
Blood Pressure
goal: <120 mmHg (based on consensus expert opinion)
Heart Rate
goal: <60 bpm (based on consensus expert opinion)
First-Line Agents:
Beta Blocker
s
Esmolol
Labetalol
20-40 mg incremental boluses IV
Consider while awaiting CT imaging and diagnosis
Metoprolol
Second-Line Agents:
Calcium Channel Blocker
s
Nicardipine
Clevidipine
Third-line Agents (
Refractory Hypertension
after rate control)
ACE Inhibitor
s (e.g. IV
Enaprilat
)
Vasodilators (e.g.
Nitroprusside
0.5-10 ug/kg/min IV)
Contraindicated before
Heart Rate
is controlled (risk of reflex
Tachycardia
)
Adjunctive measures
Decreasing pain will decrease
Blood Pressure
Older agents that have largely been replaced
Trimethaphan 1-4 mg/min IV
Pain control
IV
Opioid
s
Avoid IV
NSAID
s
Definitive Management
Proximal Aortic Dissection (Type A)
Mortality 1-2% per hour
Emergent surgical management
Distal Aortic Dissection (Type B)
Initial medical management (including
Blood Pressure
control as above)
Surgery will be needed in 20-33% of cases
Acute renal artery
Occlusion
Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion
Acute iliac
Occlusion
Hypotension
Type and crossmatch and consider transfusion
Consider Aortic Dissection-related causes (
Bedside Ultrasound
)
Cardiac Tamponade
Acute valvulopathy
Myocardial Infarction
with
Cardiogenic Shock
Ruptured aorta with
Hemothorax
Falsely depressed
Blood Pressure
(dissection causes decreased perfusion to the arm with BP cuff)
Management
Surgical
Indications for immediate, emergent surgical repair (even if neurologic deficits, coma, shock, advanced age)
All Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection
Aortic Dissection with
Hypotension
Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection
Aortic Dissection with
Acute Limb Ischemia
,
Mesenteric Ischemia
, spinal ischemia
Refractory hemodynamic instability
Aortic Rupture
Rapidly increasing aortic size
Repair Types
Open Repair
Indicated in all Type A Aortic Dissections
Indicated in
Connective Tissue Disorder
s (
Marfan Syndrome
,
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
)
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair or TEVAR
Indicated in Type B, descending Aortic Dissection repair
Endovascular stent graft inserted over proximal intimal tear
Redirects
Blood Flow
through the true lumen
Efficacy
Type A Dissection mortality reduced >30%
Aortic root repair often preserve native aortic valve in acute
Aortic Regurgitation
Complications
Open Repair
Post-operative stroke: 15%
Perioperative mortality: 25%
Acute Renal Failure
Mesenteric Ischemia
Spinal cord ischemia
Endovascular Repair (TEVAR)
Overall Mortality: 6-8%
Lower rates of spinal cord ischemia than open repair
Prognosis
High mortality: 27% even under ideal conditions
Proximal Aortic Dissection (Type A)
Mortality increases 1-3% per hour from onset (first 48 hours)
Mortality with medical therapy: 50%
Mortality with surgical management: 7-36%
Distal Aortic Dissection (Type B)
Mortality 10%
References
Mattu and Swaminathan in Herbert (2019) EM:Rap 19(1): 6-8
Mattu and Swaminathan in Herbert (2021) EM:Rap 21(3): 13-4
Rooke (2017) Vascular Medicine, Mayo Clinical Reviews, Rochester, MN
Dachs (2012) Board Review Express, San Jose
Jhun, Grock and Weinstock in Herbert (2016) EM:Rap 16(11): 11-12
Kostura (2019) Crit Dec Emerg Med 33(8):19-27
Orman and Mattu in Herbert (2015) EM:Rap 15(8):2-3
(2015) Ann Emerg Med 651(1): 32-42 [PubMed]
http://www.acep.org/workarea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=100814
Bushnell (2005) Ann Emerg Med 46:90-92 [PubMed]
Gupta (2009) Pharmaceuticals 2: 66-76 [PubMed]
Hagan (2000) JAMA 283: 897-203 [PubMed]
Type your search phrase here