Peds
Epiphyseal Fracture
search
Epiphyseal Fracture
, Growth Plate Fracture, Salter Fracture, Salter-Harris Fracture, Physeal Injury
See Also
Fractures in Children
Growth Plate
Epidemiology
Epiphysis involved in 20% of
Pediatric Fractures
Distal radius is the most commonly involved Physeal Injury (44%)
Pathophysiology
See
Growth Plate
(
Physis
)
Children have
Growth Plate
s that are much weaker than ligaments (by a factor of 2-5 fold)
Joint
Trauma
that would otherwise cause a ligamentous sprain in adults, results in a physeal
Fracture
in children
Physeal
Fracture
s may occur with minimal overlying
Soft Tissue Injury
However, suspect a concurrent type 3-4 physeal
Fracture
, when children sustain a
Ligament Sprain
Images
Grading
Mnemonic for Salter Fracture (SALTER)
Same as the epiphysis or Slip or Separate the epiphysis from the shaft
Above the
Physis
(proximal to the
Physis
)
Low anatomic or lower than the
Physis
(Below or distal to the
Physis
)
Through the
Growth Plate
(Epiphysis and Metaphysis)
Everything (Compressed)
Round, ruined or Rang
Grading
Salter-Harris classification
Salter I
Most common in newborns and young children (9% of
Growth Plate
injuries overall)
Fracture
line through the
Growth Plate
(
Physis
)
Epiphysis separates from diaphysis (shaft) and Metaphysis through the
Physis
Fracture
occurs through the hypertrophic cell layer (weakest part of the
Physis
)
Fracture
does not extend into metaphysis or epiphysis
XRay is typically normal (or
Physis
may be wider) until callus formation is visible by 10 days after
Fracture
Diagnosed clinically based on point tenderness over the epiphysis
Managed with
Splinting
and then
Casting
Prognosis excellent
Salter II
Most common overall Epiphyseal Fracture (75% of Epiphyseal Fractures)
Similar to Type 1
Fracture
through the
Physis
with separation of
Physis
from metaphysis
Unlike Type I, has a small metaphysis triangle
Fracture
(
Fracture
exit site)
Bony
Fracture
triangular fragment known as Thurston-Holland Fragment
Up to 50% displacement will completely remodel and heal within 1.5 years
Distal Radius Fracture
s are most common Type II Salter Harris
Fracture
Distal Tibia Type II
Fracture
s are higher risk for premature physeal closure and angular deformity
Treated with immobilization (
Casting
or
Splinting
)
Prognosis excellent with immobilization (although joint instability is possible)
Salter III
Uncommon and more complicated
Fracture
Similar to Type 2, but intraarticular
Fracture
through epiphysis
Fracture
through the
Physis
with separation of
Physis
from metaphysis
Unlike Type II,
Fracture
exit is intraarticular, through epiphysis and into the joint
Tillaux
Fracture
(anterolateral distal tibia
Fracture
in teens) is an example of type III
Fracture
May disrupt the
Epiphyseal Plate
proliferative and reserve zones
Risk of
Delayed Growth
and post-
Trauma
tic
Arthritis
Alignment is critical for good prognosis and maintained function
Immobilize and obtain urgent orthopedic
Consultation
Consider reduction
ORIF is often necessary (if instability or >2mm articular surface displacement)
Salter IV
Accounts for 12% of
Fracture
s
Intraarticular
Fracture
extending completely through
Growth Plate
and out of metaphysis
From joint through epiphysis,
Physis
, and out through metaphysis
Unstable
Fracture
Triplane
Fracture
s (distal tibia
Fracture
in teens) are a Type IV example
Needs perfect reduction (often open reduction is required)
Poor prognosis, lost blood supply and high risk of growth failure (especially femur or tibia)
May result in focal fusion of bone and joint deformity
Salter V
Rare
Fracture
(<1% of Epiphyseal Fractures) requiring severe mechanism (e.g. fall from height)
Crushing of
Physis
, most commonly in knee or ankle
Reserve zone of
Physis
is disrupted, resulting in loss of vascular supply
Results in arrest of bone growth, impaired function and extremity length discrepancy
Early XRay negative (similar to Type I in this regard)
Subsequent xrays demonstrate callous formation and delayed bone growth
Diagnose clinically based on point tenderness
Splint with orthopedic follow-up
Poor prognosis
Salter VI (Rang)
Portion of
Growth Plate
sheared off
Penetrating injuries
Rare
Exam
Approach: Every
Extremity Injury
Mnemonic: "joint above, joint below, circulation, motor and
Sensation
, skin and compartments"
Include examination of joint above and below the involved joint
Include
Sensory Exam
,
Motor Exam
,
Reflex Exam
and vascular exam (pulses,
Capillary Refill
)
Include skin and compartment exam
Mallon (2013)
Shoulder
Disorders, EM Bootcamp, Las Vegas
Specific to grwoth plate injury
Joint line and
Growth Plate
tenderness
Joint instability (
Ligament Sprain
)
Compare with opposite limb
Bony deformity
Precautions
Red Flags suggestive of Physeal Injury
Point tenderness over a
Growth Plate
(regardless of xray findings)
Inability to bear weight
Ligamentous sprain or instability in a child (commonly associated with underlying Grade 3-4 physeal
Fracture
)
Ankle Sprain
with rotation and supination is a risk for Tillaux
Fracture
, esp ages 12-15 (high risk injury)
Imaging
XRay (2 or more views)
First-line study in all suspected physeal injuries
Repeat XRay in 7-10 days
Do not be disarmed by a normal xray (occult physeal
Fracture
is common in Types 1 and 5)
Advanced Imaging (CT or MRI)
Indicated in suspected physeal injuries and non-diagnostic XRay
May be deferred to orthopedic provider receiving referral
Management
Analgesic
s
Acetaminophen
and
Ibuprofen
Opioid
s may be needed
Fracture
reduction
Reduce displaced
Fracture
s in the Emergency department prior to immobilization
Evaluate neurovascular status before and after reduction/immobilization
Definitive reduction should be within 5 days for Salter-Harris 1 and 2
Fracture
s
Displaced Salter-Harris 3 and 4
Fracture
s often require emergent ORIF
Follow-up with orthopedics or sports medicine
Prompt follow-up within 7-10 days for all suspected
Growth Plate
injuries
Urgent follow-up for all suspected Grade 3-5 Salter-Harris Fractures
Repeat XRay in 7-10 days
Review risks related to Growth Plate Fractures with patients and their families
Physeal arrest (5-10% of all Growth Plate Fractures)
Risk of bone growth arrest and
Limb Length Discrepancy
or angular deformity
Indications for non-removable splint (if any doubt,
Splinting
is safest approach)
Splint all Salter-Harris Fractures (with positive xray or suspected based on exam findings)
Splint injuries with significant tenderness over the
Growth Plate
despite negative XRay
Lower extremity injuries should be non-weight bearing with use of
Crutches
Indications for removable splint (pre-fabricated) or no splint (with follow-up for repeat exam)
Minor
Trauma
AND
Minimal tenderness AND
Retained function (e.g. weight bearing)
References
Claudius and Newman in Herbert (2015) EM:Rap 15(9): 2-3
Hocker et al (2016) Crit Dec Emerg Med 30(9):3-8
Sanghani, Kern and Mehta (2025) Crit Dec Emerg Med 39(2): 27-35
Peterson (1994) J Pediatr Orthop 14(4): 423-30 [PubMed]
Salter (1963) J Bone Joint Surg Am 45(3): 587-622 [PubMed]
Type your search phrase here