Procedure
Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta
search
Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta
, REBOA
See Also
Emergency Thoracotomy
Hemorrhagic Shock
Indications
Noncompressible, subdiaphragmatic
Hemorrhage
in the
Abdomen
or
Pelvis
Consider in severe
Hemorrhagic Shock
before
Cardiac Arrest
Does not replace
Resuscitative Thoracotomy
REBOA is an adjunct that reduces subdiaphragmatic
Hemorrhage
Chest
Hemorrhage
is a relative contraindication to REBOA as it would likely increase chest bleeding
Severe
Pelvic Fracture
s who have not had
Cardiac Arrest
who need immediate temporizing measures
May be considered in
Peri-Arrest
patient without obvious source of
Hemorrhage
Best used for short-term bridging to definitive procedure (risk of distal ischemia)
Contraindications (Cases in Which Emergency Thoracotomy are instead indicated)
Penetrating
Chest Trauma
Uncontrolled chest
Hemorrhage
Cardiac Tamponade
Previous vascular surgery
Suspected aortic injury
Technique
Performed in 5-10 minutes in skilled hands
Catheter insertion length determined prior to insertion (mark stop point)
Common femoral artery cannulated
Traditionally performed via very large bore catheters (12-14F)
Newer commercial kits use arterial catheters smaller than 14F
Typically placed under
Bedside Ultrasound
guidance
Percutaneous balloon delivered via femoral artery catheter and inflated in aorta above level of suspected
Hemorrhage
Avoid catheter placement in Zone 2 (between
Celiac Artery
and renal arteries)
Zone 1: Subdiaphragmatic (typical target for balloon placement), but above
Celiac Artery
Indicated for intra-abdominal bleeding (e.g. positive FAST Scan) to reduce splanchnic flow
Zone 3: Between renal arteries and iliac Bifurcation
Indicated for pelvic source of bleeding
Percutaneous balloon inflation
Arterial waveform monitored during balloon passage and inflation
Inflate the percutaneous balloon until target
Systolic
Blood Pressure
increases by 10 mmHg AND
Pulse
is not present in contralateral lower extremity
Efficacy
Efficacy is difficult to measure for a last-ditch effort to stave off death for minutes to allow for emergent surgery
Studies in 2016, suggest lower efficacy than initially thought, and may be associated with higher mortality
Inoue (2016) J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80(4): 559-67 +PMID: 26808039 [PubMed]
Retrospective study showed reduced mortality in
Hemorrhagic Shock
with REBOA compared with
Resuscitative Thoracotomy
However, this was not a direct comparative trial and further studies are needed
Cralley (2023) JAMA Surg 158(2):140-50 +PMID: 36542395 [PubMed]
Complications
Aortic Dissection
, pseudoaneurysm (or other aortic injury)
Suprarenal
Occlusion
(balloon too high, unless intended for zone 1)
Internal organ and lower extremity ischemic injury
Distal
Thromboembolism
Resources
HQMedEd (Glenn Paetow)
http://hqmeded.com/resuscitative-endovascular-balloon-occlusion-aorta-reboa/
References
Inaba in Herbert (2013) EM:Rap 13(11): 3-4
Shoenberger, Swadron and Inaba in Herbert (2018) 18(12): 10-11
Ringhauser (2019) Crit Dec Emerg Med 33(6): 19-25
Hughes (1954) Surgery 36(1):65-8 [PubMed]
Type your search phrase here