Vessel
Carotid Stenosis
search
Carotid Stenosis
, Carotid Artery Stenosis
See Also
Transient Ischemic Attack
Arteriosclerotic Carotidynia
Cerebrovascular Accident
Technique
See
Arterial Bruit
Epidemiology
CVAs caused by atherosclerosis of
Internal Carotid Artery
or intracranial arteries: 15%
Symptoms
Contralateral weakness or numbness
Ipsilateral blindness or
Amaurosis Fugax
Dominant hemisphere involvement
Dysphasia or
Aphasia
Apraxia
Exam
See
Neurologic Exam
Carotid Bruit
Unreliable due to low
Test Sensitivity
and
Specificity
Evaluation
Universal Screening in asymptomatic patients does not improve outcomes
High
False Positive Rate
in general population
LeFevre (2014) An Intern Med 161(5): 356-62 [PubMed]
Symptomatic patients with possible CVA, TIA or
Amaurosis Fugax
should be evaluated for Carotid Stenosis
Imaging
Preferred First-Line Studies
Carotid Artery
Duplex
Ultrasonography
Degree of stenosis is estimated from
Blood Flow
velocities along the carotid course
Flow rates increase as stenosis increases
Measurements altered in tortuous or highly calcified arteries
Standard first-line diagnostic tool for Carotid Stenosis
However, do not make clinical decisions based on
Ultrasound
alone (due to
False Positive
s)
Confirm findings with either a MRA or CTA
Less expensive than MRA
Accuracy for diagnosing severe Carotid Stenosis
Test Sensitivity
: 86%
Test Specificity
: 87%
CT Angiography with 3D reconstruction
Requires intravenous iodinated contrast exposure and radiation exposure
Approaches 100%
Test Sensitivity
and
Specificity
when screening for mild Carotid Stenosis
However, poorly differentiates between moderate and severe Carotid Stenosis
Test Sensitivity
: 60 to 65%
Test Specificity
: 88 to 93%
Anderson (2000) Stroke 31:2168-74 [PubMed]
Carotid Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA)
Better than
Ultrasound
at defining carotid anatomy
Accuracy for diagnosing severe Carotid Stenosis
Test Sensitivity
: 95%
Test Specificity
: 90%
References
Nederkoorn (2003) Stroke 34:1324-32 [PubMed]
Imaging
Other studies
Angiography
Gold standard which allows evaluation of the entire carotid system
Invasive procedure with risk of neurologic complications
Now used primarily to resolve imaging discrepancies in perioperative period
Management
Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Indications for carotid endarterectomy
Transient Ischemic Attack
or CVA within prior 6 months AND
Ipsilateral severe Carotid Artery Stenosis (>70%, consider for >50% by angiography) AND
Estimated perioperative morbidity and mortality <6%
https://riskcalculator.facs.org/RiskCalculator/
Surgical risk increases with neck region related factors
Tracheostomy
or other neck surgery
Prior neck radiation
Restenosis of prior carotid endarterectomy
Endarterectomy carries risk of significant morbidity
Cognitive changes may be difficult to discern
Risk of CVA within 30 days of procedure: 7%
Symptomatic patient with Carotid Stenosis >70%
Intervention offers greatest benefit (17%
Absolute Risk Reduction
at 2 years per NASCET study)
Significant benefit from carotid endarterectomy
Benefits include patients over age 75 years
CVA will occur in 1-2% of patients with >70% stenosis who do not undergo intervention
Symptomatic patient with Carotid Stenosis 50 to 69%
Benefit from carotid endarterectomy
Benefits include patients over age 75 years
Symptomatic patient with Carotid Stenosis <50%
No benefit from carotid endarterectomy
See
Prevention of Ischemic Stroke
Management
Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis >60%
Consider carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis >80%
Medical therapy: Indicated if Carotid Stenosis <80%
Overall CVA Risk on medical therapy: 12% CVA 5 year risk
See
Prevention of Ischemic Stroke
Hypertension
control (typical goal is <130/80)
Exercise
caution with bilateral Carotid Stenosis
Hyperlipidemia
control with
Statin
s
Antiplatelet options
Aspirin
Other antiplatelet agents are not recommended
Clopidogrel
(
Plavix
)
Do not use concurrently with
Aspirin
Aspirin
with
Dipyridamole
(
Aggrenox
)
Management
Surgical Procedures
Overall CVA Risk on surgical therapy: 6% CVA 5 year risk
Relative contraindications to carotid endarterectomy
Women show less benefit in asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Life Expectancy
<5 years
Active cardiovascular disease
Age over 80 years
Concomitant intranial stenosis
Contralateral Carotid Stenosis
Carotid endarterectomy
Five year stroke risk reduction decreases with endarterectomy delay from symptom onset (>50% Carotid Stenosis)
NNT 5 if endarterectomy performed within 2 weeks of symptom onset
NNT 125 if endarterectomy performed within 12 weeks of symptom onset
Complications
Stroke or death occurs within 7% of patients in first 30 days, and 15% within 5 years
Rerkasem (2020) Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9): CD001081 [PubMed]
Angioplasty
with Stent and Distal Protection
As effective as carotid endarterectomy
May be preferred in patients at high risk of complications due to comorbidity
(2006) Lancet 368:1239-47 [PubMed]
Park (2006) Am J Surg 192: 583-8 [PubMed]
Higher risk of morbidity and mortality in first 3 months after intervention (NNH 32 compared with endarterectomy)
Increased risk appears due to stenting of an unstable
Plaque
(esp. age >70 years)
Those age <70 years have similar complication rates to carotid endarterectomy at 3 months
After 3 months, complication rates are the same
European trials (SPACE and EVA-3S) studies with high complication rates did not use distal protection devices
Muller (2020) Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD000515 [PubMed]
Rantner (2013) J Vasc Surg 57(3): 619-26 [PubMed]
Bonati (2011) Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41(2): 153-8 [PubMed]
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization
Newer carotid revascularization procedure
Carotid Artery
clamped proximal top stenosis, artery incised and clot removed
Trialed in patients at high risk of endarterectomy complications with stroke or death 2.3% at 30 days
Kashyap (2020) Stroke 51(9): 2620-9 [PubMed]
References
Alamowitch (2001) Lancet 357:1154-60 [PubMed]
Ellis (1992) Eur J Vasc Surg 6(2):172-7 [PubMed]
Firnhaber (2022) Am Fam Physician 105(1): 65-72 [PubMed]
Gutierrez (1985) Am Surg 51(7):388-91 [PubMed]
Halliday (2004) Lancet 363:1491-502 [PubMed]
Rothwell (2003) Lancet 361:107-16 [PubMed]
Shorr (1998) J Gen Intern Med 13(2):86-90 [PubMed]
Type your search phrase here